KAS Current Affairs
Preliminary Examination
Paper-I: Current Events of National and International Importance
Paper-II: Current Events of State Importance and Important Government Schemes and Programs
Main Examination
Paper-I: Essays
Essay – 1:
“Critically analyze India’s multi-alignment strategy in a multipolar global system.”
Essay – 2:
“Evaluate Karnataka’s contribution to India’s renewable energy mission, especially in terms of solar and wind power projects.”
Paper-II: General Studies 1
New GDP data set to capture economy more accurately: Ministry of Statistics
Context: The new series of national accounts to be released on Friday is the culmination of a wide consultative process, spanning multiple sub-committees, and incorporating many changes.
- The new series of national accounts data to be released will incorporate several methodological and statistical upgrades that will make India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Gross Value Added (GVA) data more accurate and granular.
- These upgrades include better methodologies, and the inclusion of new data sets, such as the Goods and Services Tax (GST) data.
- The most visible of the changes in the national accounts data is that the base year will be updated from 2011-12 to 2022-23, making both the GDP and GVA data more accurate representations of the current economy, while also improving comparisons over time periods.
- The Sub-Committee on Methodological Improvements proposed several sector-wise improvements that have been implemented.
- For instance, for the non-financial private corporate sector, the currently-used 2011-12 series of data deals with companies that operate across sectors by allocating that entire company’s GVA to the sector in which the bulk of its activity is.
- In the new series, the activity-wise revenue share for a company is being used to calculate the value added in each business activity. This will help capture all the activity in each sector.
- Another improvement, to do with the general government sector, is that the new series will also include the value of the housing services provided by governments to their employees. This will mean that the value of services provided is more accurately captured when measuring the output of the general government.
- Further, the coverage of autonomous institutes and local bodies has also been enhanced.
- For households, the new series will use the Annual Survey of Unincorporated Sector Enterprises (ASUSE) and Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) on an annual basis instead of extrapolating data as was done in the 2011-12 series. This will mean that the household sector, which has a significant contribution to the economy, is directly estimated each year.
- Another major component of the economy — private final consumption expenditure, or basically consumption spending by the people — will also be measured in a more granular manner through the enhanced use of Household Consumer Expenditure Surveys and direct estimation based on production and other data sources.
New data sources
- The new series of national accounts data will also include new data sources and will use existing sources better. For example, GST data was so far being used in the quarterly accounts of GDP and GVA, and only for some sectors in the annual data.
- In the new series, GST data will be used to better estimate the regional output of private corporations, and will also be used to more accurately determine the contribution of the value added by private companies to the GDP of the country. The GST data will also be used to identify active private companies to improve the accuracy of estimating the value added by non-reporting companies. This will ensure that output and value added data more accurately captures what is happening on the ground.
- The Sub-Committee on Incorporation for New Data Sources, Rates and Ratios also noted that States have enhanced their reporting of data from local bodies and state autonomous bodies, which will increase the amount of data that can be directly estimated rather than imputed.
- The new series will use the Statistical Table Related to Banks in India (STRBI) published by the Reserve Bank of India to estimate the activity of both public sector banks as well as private sector banks. Further, the earlier proxy-based approach to estimate the activity of private Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) is being replaced by the use of actual financial data of NBFCs from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
- Overall, the ASUSE data has been used more effectively to capture aspects that were earlier not being included accurately.
Paper-III: General Studies 2
Bulldozer Justice, Constitutional Morality, and the Doctrine of Due Process
The recent observations of the Allahabad High Court on so-called “bulldozer justice” have reignited an important constitutional debate: Can the executive demolish property immediately after registration of an FIR? More fundamentally, what is the scope of due process of law and procedure established by law in India?
The Court has questioned whether demolitions carried out soon after criminal allegations—without notice, hearing, or adjudication—violate constitutional guarantees under Articles 14 (Equality), 21 (Life and Personal Liberty), and 300A (Right to Property). The issue touches the very heart of constitutional governance and separation of powers.
1. What is “Bulldozer Justice”?
“Bulldozer justice” refers to the practice of demolishing properties allegedly linked to accused persons immediately after criminal incidents. While authorities claim such actions are taken under municipal laws against illegal constructions, courts have increasingly examined whether such demolitions are:
- Punitive in nature
- Targeted selectively
- Executed without procedural safeguards
- Intended as extra-judicial punishment
The core constitutional question is:
Can the executive punish without judicial determination of guilt?
2. Constitutional Framework
(A) Article 21 – Right to Life and Personal Liberty
“No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.”
This article forms the backbone of due process protection in India.
(B) Article 14 – Equality Before Law
State action must not be arbitrary, selective, or discriminatory.
(C) Article 300A – Right to Property
No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.
Demolition without legal procedure directly engages Article 300A.
3. Due Process of Law vs Procedure Established by Law
(1) Procedure Established by Law (Indian Model – Original Understanding)
Initially interpreted narrowly, it meant:
- As long as there is a validly enacted law
- And procedure prescribed by that law is followed
- The deprivation is constitutionally valid
The focus was on formal legality, not fairness.
(2) Due Process of Law (American Concept)
This doctrine requires:
- Law must be just, fair, and reasonable
- Procedure must not be arbitrary
- Courts can examine substantive fairness of law
It protects both:
- Procedural due process
- Substantive due process
4. Judicial Evolution in India
Indian constitutional jurisprudence has transformed Article 21 from a narrow procedural protection into a robust due process guarantee.
(1) A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)
- Early narrow interpretation
- Court held: If there is a law and procedure is followed, Article 21 is satisfied
- No need to test fairness of the procedure
This reflected a strict “procedure established by law” approach.
(2) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) – Landmark Judgment
This case revolutionized Article 21.
The Supreme Court held:
- Procedure must be “right, just and fair”
- Not arbitrary, fanciful, or oppressive
- Articles 14, 19, and 21 are interconnected
This effectively incorporated substantive due process into Indian constitutional law.
Now, any state action must satisfy:
- Non-arbitrariness (Article 14)
- Fair procedure (Article 21)
- Reasonableness (Article 19)
5. Due Process and Demolition Jurisprudence
(A) Re: Directions in the Matter of Demolition of Structures (2024)
The Supreme Court clarified:
- Property cannot be demolished merely because owner is accused.
- Municipal powers cannot be used as punitive tools.
- Guilt must be determined by courts.
- Executive cannot assume judicial function.
This reinforces:
- Presumption of innocence
- Separation of powers
- Procedural safeguards
(B) Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)
- Right to livelihood is part of Article 21.
- Even pavement dwellers must receive notice before eviction.
This case established that:
Even unauthorized occupants cannot be removed without due process.
(C) State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952)
Established that:
- Arbitrary classification violates Article 14.
Selective demolitions may violate equality.
(D) K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)
Though about privacy, this case reaffirmed:
- Constitutional morality
- Proportionality
- Due process embedded in Article 21
6. What Does Due Process Require in Demolition Cases?
Before demolition, authorities must:
- Identify legal violation
- Issue written notice
- Provide reasonable opportunity of hearing
- Pass reasoned order
- Allow appeal
- Ensure action is proportionate
- Avoid targeting based on criminal allegations alone
If demolition happens immediately after FIR:
- It suggests punitive intent
- Violates presumption of innocence
- May amount to colourable exercise of power
7. Colourable Exercise of Power
In administrative law, this means:
Using a lawful power for an unlawful objective.
Example:
- Municipal demolition power used to punish an accused person.
Even if form is legal, substance may be unconstitutional.
8. Larger Constitutional Concerns
(A) Separation of Powers
- Judiciary determines guilt.
- Executive enforces law.
- Executive cannot impose punishment.
(B) Presumption of Innocence
Demolition before conviction undermines criminal justice principles.
(C) Rule of Law
Arbitrary state action erodes trust in constitutional governance.
9. Preventive Judicial Intervention
High Courts under Article 226 and Supreme Court under Article 32 can:
- Stay demolition
- Protect fundamental rights
- Enforce procedural safeguards
Courts have increasingly intervened to:
- Prevent irreversible harm
- Ensure accountability
10. Balancing Governance and Rights
Urban planning laws are valid and necessary. Illegal constructions can be demolished.
However:
- Demolition must be regulatory, not punitive.
- It must be neutral and uniform.
- It cannot be selective or exemplary.
Conclusion
The debate around bulldozer justice is not about development versus illegality. It is about constitutional discipline.
India’s constitutional jurisprudence has evolved from a narrow “procedure established by law” model to a robust due process framework where:
- Law must be fair.
- Procedure must be reasonable.
- State action must not be arbitrary.
- Punishment must follow judicial determination.
Bulldozers may serve urban governance.
They cannot replace courts of law.
The Allahabad High Court’s scrutiny is therefore not merely administrative—it is a reaffirmation of constitutional morality, rule of law, and due process as the bedrock of democratic governance.
Creidits: ChatGPT
Paper-IV: General Studies 3
IIA uses radio telescope, Aditya-L1 satellite payload to make key solar observation
Context: Astronomers from the Indian Institute of Astrophysics (IIA) have made observations of shocks driven by coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from the Sun by using its Gauribidanur radio telescope and Visible Emission Line Coronagraph (VELC) payload onboard Aditya-L1 satellite.
Thunder-like noise
- A sonic boom is a thunder-like noise that occurs when the speed of an aircraft traveling through the air faster than the speed of sound.
- Similarly, fast CMEs from the Sun drive shocks near the Earth leading to space weather disturbances. “These shocks are primarily driven by the same set of CMEs, all the way from near the Sun through the interplanetary space. Shocks near the Sun are the birth stage of the shocks observed near Earth. The characteristic signatures of the shocks near the Sun are intense transient emission observed primarily with ground-based radio telescopes at low frequencies, typically <150 MHz,” the IIA team.
- The IIA operates a radio telescope in the above frequency range, at the Gauribidanur radio observatory, located about 100 km north of Bengaluru. It is presently the only low-frequency radio telescope for dedicated observations of the Sun.
- The team said that with the launch of VELC, built by IIA, it has become possible to identify the CMEs that give rise to the shocks, particularly near the Sun and in the visible wavelength range. Combining data obtained with the Gauribidanur radio facility and VELC, the VELC team at IIA has precisely estimated the onset distance of the shock due to the CME that occurred on May 27, 2024. It is approximately 130,000 km from the Sun. The shock driven by the CME propagated at a speed of approximately 1,700 km per second near the Sun.
- This is the closest distance from the Sun at which a CME driven shock and the associated radio transient have been observed unambiguously as on date.
- The present result would not have been possible but for the unique low-frequency observing capability of the Gauribidanur radio telescope and the possibility to observe the near-Sun solar corona with the VELC. The results will appear soon in the Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, a leading international journal.
- Continuous and coordinated observations of the Sun with Gauribidanur facilities and VELC during the current maximum phase of the ongoing sunspot cycle 25, as well as beyond, are expected to identify CME driven shocks as close as thirty thousand kilometers from the Sun.
Paper-V: General Studies 4
Ethics Case Study – Human–Elephant Conflict in Chikkamagaluru District
Background:
In the hilly regions of Chikkamagaluru district, a herd of wild elephants has repeatedly entered villages, causing damage to agricultural crops and creating fear among residents. In a recent incident, around 30–35 elephants entered farmland and destroyed crops such as coffee, maize, and other produce. Farmers have suffered significant financial losses and are demanding immediate compensation and effective action to drive the elephants back into the forest.
The Forest Department has initiated operations to push the elephants away. However, certain wildlife activists argue that capturing or relocating the elephants may not be appropriate and could disturb ecological balance. The situation presents a complex challenge involving environmental conservation, human safety, and livelihood protection.
You are the District Collector responsible for addressing the issue and ensuring both immediate relief and long-term solutions.
Ethical Issues Involved
1.Human safety vs Wildlife conservation
2.Farmers’ livelihoods vs Ecological balance
3.Immediate action vs Sustainable long-term measures
4.Emotional public pressure vs Scientific decision-making
5.Public demand vs Legal and environmental regulations
Stakeholders
Local farmers and villagers
Forest Department officials
Wildlife experts
Animal rights organizations
District administration
State government
Options Available
Option 1:
Capture and relocate the elephants immediately.
Option 2:
Strengthen temporary protection measures around villages and provide financial compensation to farmers.
Option 3:
Develop a long-term strategy to reduce human–wildlife conflict (e.g., elephant corridors, solar fencing, rapid response teams).














